22.033 Cor e Gr oup - R eact or Concep t and Decision Making

Pr ocess

R obert Dr enkhahn Br endan Ensor Jessic a Hammond Ruaridh Macdonal d

1

Ov er vie w

• Final Deci si on

• R eact or C oncep ts

• Choice Jus ti fi c a ti on

• Mo ving F or w ar d

2

Final Decision

• Lead Cooled F as t R eact or

• Super crit ic al C O2 Sec ondary Loop

• Looking a t r ang e of siz es >5 00 M W e (desi gned t o dim ini shi ng r e tur ns t o sc ale)

3

R eact or Concepts

• Super crit ic al W a t er/C O2

• T r a v elli ng W a v e

• Molt en Salt

• CA NDU

• V er y High T emper a tur e R eact or (VH TR)

• Sodium F as t R eact or (SFR)

• Lead F as t R eact or (SFR)

4

Super critic al Coola n t R eact or

• Super crit ic al W a t er R eact or

– One of the Gen IV r eac t or desi gns

– Ex cell en t hea t tr ans f e r , no boi li ng in c or e

– 2 0 MP a , 550 o C

– Hi gh Thermal t o E lectri c E f fici ency (~45%)

– V ery si mp le B WR - esq ue des ign

– Ma t eri als c oncerns

– Super criti c al C O 2 Op tion s

5

T r a v elling W a v e R eact or

– Br eed a nd Burn c oncep t

• St art with some enric hed Ur anium t o g et c or e c ritic al a t some loc a tion

• Then thr ough neutr on ab sorp tion U - 23 8 bec omes P u - 23 9 which then fissio ns c ausing the same thing t o mo r e U- 238

– Long lif e, on - li ne r e fuel in g

– P ot en ti al t o use “un w an t ed” fuel

– Pr oli f er a tion c oncern

– Not the t emp er a tur es w e w er e looki ng f or

6

Molt en Sa lt

• Ab le t o sc ale t o man y desir ed p o w er le v els

• No hi gh pr essu r e – elim ina t es need f or a pr ess uri z er

• Ex tr emely high neg a ti v e t emper a tur e c oe f fi cien t

• Br eeder R eact or wit h Thori um w ould be e x tr emely c os t e f f ectiv e

• Man y haz ar dous ma t erial s such as HF and Be

7

CANDU

• Ab le t o use v arious ple n ti ful sour ces of fuel

• Hea v y W a t er Moder a t or is an e xpensiv e c apit al c os t

• Moder a t or is unpr essu riz ed, thi nner fuel bundl e tubes

• Al r eady op er a ti onal in se v er al na ti ons

• T emper a tur e R equir emen ts f or th is pr oject w er e t oo high f or CAN DU

8

Very High Tempera ture Reactor (VHTR)

Qu ick F acts:

( http://www.gen-4.org/Technology/systems/vhtr.htm )

Courtesy of Idaho National Laboratory. Used with permission.

• Pr im ar y Coolan t: Hel ium • Neutro n Spe ctrum: Therm al

• Mod er a t or: Gr aph it e • Ef fi ci e ncy: >50%

• Neutr on Spectrum: Ther m al • Fue l O pti ons: Sp her i ca l or

• Ou tle t T em per a tur es: up t o 1 00 0˚C

Pri sma ti c

9

V er y High T empe r a tur e R eact or (VHTR )

Notable Fe ature s:

• Coate d Fuel P ar ti cl e s

• P assi v e Sa fet y F e ature s

• V e ry Hi gh T e mp e r ature s

Courtesy of Idaho National Laboratory. Used with permission.

10

• Gener al

SFR a nd LFR Designs

• F as t spectr um – possible in t er gr a tio n in t o clo sed fu el cy cle

• Ex cell en t ther mal pr oper tie s

• Lar g e hea t sink, easier c ool ing , sm all f oot prin t,

• Lo w pr essur e

• P assiv e saf ety

SFR LFR

Mini mal modera tio n Mini mal modera tio n Low mel tin g poi nt High bo il in g poi nt

Operation al experienc e Range of s cal es

High er temp. pos si bl e

V ol ati le materi al

Some ac tivati on Dif fic ul t st art - up

Som e act ivation

11

Mini mal US experi enc e

Neut ronics

Bot h very go od

Com parison

Minimal mode ration an d voiding, bu rn

actin ides

Could have positive breed ing r atio Na a nd LBE bo th activa te

Thermal

Sod ium prob ab ly slightly b ett er Le ad requ ires >328 ° C start - up

Oth er

Le ad isn't a s vola tile

No int ermedia te loop requ ired w/ lead Le ad can corrod e st ee l

R eact or Design Choice R easoning

• Comp act Siz e/Small F ootpri n t

• Sa f e ty F ea tur es

• Therm al Pr opert ies

• V arie ty of P ow er Le v els

• Ex otic Desi gn - Ques ti ons t o be ans w er ed/In t er es ti ng t o w ork on

• Na tur al Cir cula ti on P ossi bil it ies

13

Looking F or w ar d - Cor e

• Lead vs . Lead- Bi sm uth Coolan t

• Begin Modeli ng R eact or i n MC NP

• R eact or P ow er Decis ion

• Ma t erial Choices

14

Looking F or w ar d - Plan t

• Lead t o C O2 Hea t Ex chang er

• Super crit ic al C O2 Vi abil it y

• T urbi nes

• Split poin t f or Pr ocess Hea t

15

QUE S TIONS?

16

MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu

22.033 / 22.33 Nuclear Systems Design Project

Fa ll 2011

For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms .